The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
Blog Article
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, fairly he has long been acquitted from the criminal charges based get more info on evidence and it really is very well-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents from the boy or Female usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they will Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is actually a mandatory prerequisite and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed on the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[4]
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be just one or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for the decision of the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all might be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may very well be adopted in an argument.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.